I
still find reflective learning difficult. The need to be critical rather than
descriptive is challenging, I think, because of my experience studying A-Level
English. Despite being given some guidelines, I feel as though I need some
feedback that what I am doing is correct. I do not know if I am entitled to
have it ‘assessed’ by my tutor, although I do not think so. This is obviously
something I need to find out. However, I think I have improved since I started
writing. I suppose throughout my course I will automatically adapt to the
writing standard demand of me. I am trying to improve my ability to critically
analysis journal articles and academic
textbooks, which I think develops as I read.
In our
previous tutorial, the group had the task of reading two different journal
articles, one of which was utterly tedious. Not only was it long, but also hard
to read and, after a while, I found it difficult to concentrate so I skipped to
the conclusion and took notes from that. The language the author used was very
complex and he seemed to lack structure in his writing, often jumping from one
idea to the next and back again. Now in the context of the entire book this
journal may have made some sense. For
me it was too much at such an early stage but I also found it slightly
difficult to pinpoint the key ideas and arguments from the journal. The second
journal was not as bad and I found it a much easier and more interesting read. I
enjoyed its exploration of how an image can be represented in different ways
and create an imaginative Geography that becomes embedded in social culture as
‘fact’ through the researcher’s use of the Apollo Earth images as examples. I
still had to take a break from reading since I am currently a slow reader
because it takes me a while to understand what the author is trying to say. Despite
not knowing what questions to consider when reading these articles, I noted
down ideas I thought were key and suggested them in a tutorial session. At
first, I found it difficult to contribute to group discussions as I was trying
to follow other people’s train of thought as well as trying to figure out which
part I wanted to discuss. However, when I had finally thought of a point to
raise I think I managed to put across my idea quite well, but it is clear that
I am slow to think of points and I am too quiet. This may be due to a lack of
confidence, an issue which I know I have faced a lot in my life, or perhaps I
am slightly intimidated by the members in my group since, although I am
improving, I am still shy and am not yet confident in my ability. In order to
combat this, I think it is important that I put myself in pressured situations that
require me to speak and contribute more to discussions, which could be done
through the university Career Zone. However, when I suddenly realised what my
point could be I think I managed to put across my statement, which reflected on
one of the parts of the journal I found so interesting.
Thanks
to another tutorial session, I now know the reading skills I have to develop.
Currently I have a ‘surface approach’ to reading rather than the ideal ‘deep
approach’ because, at the moment, I don’t try to relate ideas I come across in
other topics to what I read and I don’t often find myself questioning what I
read. I hope that now I have a list of questions to reflect on when reading
geographical articles, my reading approach will change. I think that it is important
for me to continue reading as many journals as possible because I think the
more I read, the more I will understand and be able to critically analyse what
I read.
~ Jones' Journal